POLICY BRIEF NO. 1

Prioritizing Emerging
All-Domain Technologies

Luis D. Elizondo
Member, Board of Directors

January 9, 2025

I. Summary: This policy brief highlights one of the most pressing challenges to American and global security: Emerging All-Domain Technologies (EADT). EADT include Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS, also known as drones), Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP, formerly known as UFOs), and certain other advanced systems operating across the air, space, and sea domains that are capable of intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and kinetic strikes.

Recent events like the drone incursions in New Jersey and the Chinese spy balloon incidents underscore a critical gap: The U.S. woefully lacks a whole-of-government solution to EADT. To solve this problem, this policy brief recommends that the President empower a White House Senior Advisor, or “Czar,” within the National Security Council to: (1) coordinate the U.S. Government’s EADT response; (2) formulate policy; (3) and conduct domestic and international outreach.

II. The EADT Challenge: EADT represent a paradigm shift. They combine advanced—and, in some cases, beyond-next-generation—capabilities in stealth, loiter, maneuverability, and speed. These technologies not only herald a revolution in military and intelligence capabilities but also enable rogue actors to wreak untold havoc. UAP technology in particular could fundamentally alter geopolitics—and our understanding of physics.

a. Drones: The Ukrainian conflict has witnessed rapid advancements in UAS, revolutionizing warfare and unlocking asymmetrical advantages that have upended traditional combat. China and other countries are taking note. At home, UAS frequently violate restricted military and civilian airspace, operating across spectrums either unintegrated or wholly unmonitored by our data collection systems. At the federal level, the U.S. military and an alphabet soup of agencies have responded haphazardly to UAS. Meanwhile, state, federal, local, and tribal authorities are left in the dark.

The proliferation of advanced UAS technology to rogue states and non-state actors portends a gray area of future conflict having consequences farther reaching than cyber warfare. In the wrong hands, UAS can surveil and disrupt sensitive U.S. installations and critical infrastructure, disrupt aviation, harass citizens, transport illegal drugs, and facilitate human trafficking. More than 20 years after terrorists flew commercial aircraft into buildings and despite the overhaul of the Intelligence Community (IC) to prevent such a catastrophe from recurring, the U.S. Government still has no remedy to UAS. The American people are livid over the chaos and the cover-ups.

b. UAP: UAP are even more perplexing, possessing capabilities that defy our conventional knowledge. The intentions behind them also remain dimly understood. Mastery of UAP technology would, however, eclipse the advent of yesteryear’s printing press and splitting of the atom, today’s transformations in semiconductors, and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in quantum computing and artificial intelligence—all at once.

But while the U.S. stigmatizes even discussing UAP, America’s enemies are racing to unlock their technology and gain a decisive edge. Consequently, UAP can no longer be distinguished entirely from UAS and other EADT, hobbling our domain awareness and response. The presence of UAP and UAS around U.S. nuclear facilities is especially disturbing, jeopardizing our strategic deterrent and international stability. Although Congress created the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office within the Department of Defense (DoD) to analyze UAP, the office remains hopelessly mired in bureaucracy, overly siloed, and unable to achieve its mission. The U.S. Government’s doubling down on the decades-long obfuscation of the UAP matter has similarly eroded the public’s trust.

c. Failure’s Price: The cumulative result of these failures includes: (1) unfocused research and development; (2) uncompetitive technological progress compared to Russia and China due to over-compartmentalization of classified projects; (3) a chaotic response to EADT incursions; (4) a reactive—or nonexistent—U.S. EADT diplomacy, industrial base, doctrine, and force posture; and (5) a citizenry rightfully suspicious of their government.

III. Solving the Problem: EADT represent a rapidly shifting, cross-cutting challenge that demands sustained attention at the highest level. There are, however, several immediate initiatives and policy options that are available for consideration.

Foremost among these is the creation of a Senior Advisor to the President for Emerging All-Domain Technologies. At a high level, this “Czar” would: (1) coordinate a whole-of-government response to EADT; (2) develop national EADT policy; and (3) serve as the principal advisor to the President and engage with Congress, the media, and the American people on these important issues. Congressional support will be critically important.

Alternatively, an existing DoD or IC official could be tasked with the added responsibility of addressing EADT, but there may be disadvantages. Such “dual-hatting” may distract that official from existing priorities and lead to mission creep. Depending on the official’s seniority, they may lack both the gravitas to engage other elements and the necessary access to the President.

IV. Responsibilities of the EADT Czar: As established by a National Security Presidential Memorandum or other appropriate Executive action, the Senior Advisor for EADT would:

  • Coordinate the federal, state, local, and tribal response to EADT at home and overseas, e.g., U.S. military facilities, embassies, nuclear plants, and other critical infrastructure. Specific coordination duties would include:

    • Integrating domain-specific collection capabilities and improving “tipping and cueuing” procedures to help establish a common operating picture of U.S. airspace and other domains.

    • Optimizing DoD and IC acquisition to bring needed EADT capabilities quickly to bear.

    • Streamlining federal, state, local, and tribal reporting of EADT information through the Department of Homeland Security’s Fusion Centers.

    • Leveraging U.S. Space Force and U.S. Space Command to ensure national-level collection requirements are recognized and fulfilled.

  • Lead EADT discussions with the National Security Council and Cabinet.

  • Formulate an Annual National EADT Strategy to serve as a blueprint for advancing America’s interests in UAS, UAP, and other EADT domestically 3 and internationally. The strategy would identify global trends constituting threats or opportunities, delineate priorities and reforms, and guide academic and private-sector institutions to shape and respond to a rapidly changing EADT reality.

  • At the President’s direction, guide a National Intelligence Estimate on EADT, including UAP.

  • Develop other national policies that analyze EADT’s potential impact on national security, economic conditions, the nation’s research priorities, and foreign policy. Provide assessments to the President, Congress, and relevant agencies.

  • Access all UAP-related classified information. Advise the President on the declassification of UAP-related records and spearhead responsible UAP transparency. Enforce the 25-year mandatory declassification of all UAP information other than as exempted by the President case-by-case.

  • Recommend statutory and other authorities to enable the U.S. Government to protect the homeland and conduct counter-EADT investigations and operations.

  • Accelerate research in advanced propulsion and technologies by engaging the academic and scientific communities, as well as the private sector.

V. Conclusion: As the evolution in EADT accelerates, challenges are inevitable—and looming. The U.S. Government must therefore be proactive while the strategic terrain is relatively favorable. It must also better communicate with the American people about the risks and opportunities of EADT and assure them that all efforts will be made to safeguard the nation.

Our country has an unprecedented opportunity to recapture the competitive edge. White House recognition and elevation of EADT is one of the most pressing national security issues confronting the incoming Administration. A Czar for EADT will allow the President and other key decisionmakers to get the answers they need, when they need them.

America can handle the truth, and America deserves the truth.